Alright, imagine you're playing with your favorite LEGO blocks. You have a big box of them, and you want to build something really cool, like a castle or a spaceship.

Now, OpenAI is like the kid who has a special way of putting those LEGO blocks together to make amazing things. They've been doing this for a while now, but until recently, they said they weren't doing it for money. It was more like they just loved building with their LEGO blocks and wanted to share their cool creations with everyone.

But then, some other kids (like Microsoft) saw how awesome OpenAI's creations were and said, "We'll give you lots of money if you keep making these amazing things!" So, OpenAI started thinking that maybe it would be okay to make some money while they're building their cool stuff too.

However, some people who love LEGO blocks (and the way OpenAI builds with them) are worried. They think that if OpenAI starts focusing more on money than on just having fun and being creative, they might not build as many cool things anymore. So, they wrote a letter saying they want OpenAI to still be open and fun like before.

And now, some kids who got an early look at one of OpenAI's newest creations (called Sora) have been showing it off on their toys (like Twitter). They think this new creation is so cool that maybe the next best LEGO castles and spaceships will be made by AI like OpenAI!

But, even though some kids are excited about these new AI creations, others worry they might not be as good as something a kid could build with their own hands. That's why everyone is talking about this right now. It's like a big playground debate! Read from source...

Based on the provided tweets and news article, here are some points that could be seen as critical or highlighting potential issues with OpenAI's shift in approach:

1. **Lack of Immediate Response**: The news article mentions that OpenAI did not immediately respond to Benzinga's request for comments. This could imply a lack of transparency or openness, which contradicts the letter's sentiment about becoming more open.

2. **Leaked Information**: The tweets mention leaked information about OpenAI Sora being available on Hugging Face Space and an anime video generated by Sora. If true, this suggests that despite claims of avoiding negative impacts (like influencing global elections), OpenAI is not fully in control of its models once they're out.

3. **Artistic Concerns**: Some AI-generated content can raise concerns about originality, copyright, and the value or authenticity of human-created art. Critics might argue that while OpenAI supports the arts through PR stunts, it may also devalue them by flooding markets with AI-generated artworks.

4. **Financial Focus**: The article mentions OpenAI's transition to a for-profit model, which could suggest a shift in focus from promoting beneficial AI (as per its original mission) to maximizing profits. Critics might argue that this shift could lead to more emphasis on commercial applications over social good or artistic expression.

5. **Leadership Changes**: The departure of key figures like CTO Mira Murati could raise concerns about stability and direction within the company.

6. **Potential for Over-reliance on AI**: While not directly criticized in these tweets, there's a broader concern that excessive use of AI (like AI-generated anime) could lead to society over-relying on automated systems, potentially leading to job displacement and other societal changes.

7. **Ethical Concerns**: The letter writer criticizes OpenAI for 'PR stunts' instead of genuine support for the arts. This suggests a potential disconnect between the company's messaging and its actions, which could be seen as unethical.

Sentiment: Neutral

The article discusses concerns about OpenAI's lack of openness and support for artists, as well as the company's potential shift from a nonprofit to a for-profit model. However, it also mentions recent progress with the Sora project and does not express an overall positive or negative opinion on the company's current state or future prospects. It merely presents information without taking a clear stance. Therefore, the sentiment is neutral.