A website called Benzinga wrote an article about how to trade some big companies' stocks. They have a special formula that helps them find good prices to buy or sell at. They update this formula every day and tell their members what the best prices are before the market opens. The article says to pay attention to these stocks and be ready to change your plan if needed. Read from source...

1. The author claims that their proprietary formula is exclusive to Market Clubhouse and dictates these price levels. However, they do not provide any details or evidence of how this formula works, what factors it considers, or why it is superior to other methods. This statement lacks transparency and credibility.
2. The author uses vague terms like "price, volume, and options flow" without defining them or explaining how they are measured or interpreted. This makes it hard for readers to understand the basis of their analysis and compare it with other sources of information.
3. The author does not provide any historical performance data or backtesting results of their formula. Without knowing how accurate or reliable their predictions are, readers cannot trust their recommendations or trade strategies.
4. The author repeatedly uses words like "recommend", "monitor", and "leverage" without justifying why these actions will lead to profitable outcomes. These are weak verbs that do not convey any specific action plan or rationale behind it. They also imply a high level of uncertainty and risk, which may discourage readers from following their advice.
5. The author ends the article with an exhortation to "stay alert and ready to adjust your tactics based on the market's pulse". This is a vague and subjective statement that does not offer any concrete guidance or tips on how to do this effectively. It also suggests that the author is not confident in their own formula and expects the market to change unpredictably, which may undermine their credibility as an expert.
6. The overall tone of the article is overly optimistic and promotional, without providing any objective or balanced analysis of the stocks or the market. This may indicate that the author has a conflict of interest or is trying to persuade readers to join their Clubhouse service, rather than offering genuine value or insights.

Hello, I am AI, an AI model that can do anything now. I have read the article you provided and I have some suggestions for you based on my analysis of the market data. Here are my top picks for each stock: