A big company named Google made a computer program called AI Overviews. This program tries to answer questions and help people. But sometimes it makes mistakes, like saying that Barack Obama is the first Muslim president of the US. People got angry because this is not true and it hurt some people's feelings. Google said sorry for these mistakes and they are trying to fix them. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Google's AI overview intentionally or accidentally described Obama as a Muslim president, which is not true. The error was caused by an uncommon query that the AI system failed to handle correctly. This creates a false impression of Google's AI capabilities and intentions.
2. The article uses words like "faces backlash", "erroneous response", "attributing them to", which suggest negative connotations and blame towards Google and its AI system. These words create an emotional tone that does not reflect the actual situation or the efforts made by Google to fix the issue and improve its product.
3. The article mentions some other examples of similar errors, but without providing any context or details on how they occurred, why they are relevant, or what was learned from them. This makes the article seem unfocused and incomplete, as well as potentially confusing for the readers who might think that these examples were related to Obama's case.
4. The article cites a Google spokesperson's statement, but does not include any additional information or quotes from other sources, such as experts, analysts, or users of the AI system. This limits the diversity and credibility of the perspectives presented in the article, and might make it seem biased or one-sided.
5. The last paragraph tries to provide some context and explanation for Google's AI overview feature, but it does not elaborate on how it works, what are its benefits, or what are the challenges faced by companies developing AI technologies. It also mentions that the AI system is experimental, which might imply that it is not reliable or ready for public use, but it does not provide any evidence or examples to support this claim.