A former boss from a big company that works on making smart computers says that these smart computers could be the most important thing humans ever make. He thinks they can help us live better lives and explore new places in space. But, he also knows there are some problems with these computers that need to be solved carefully. Read from source...

- Kass's statement that AI could be the last technology humans ever invent is a speculative and exaggerated claim that lacks empirical evidence or sound reasoning. It ignores the possibility of future technological breakthroughs and innovations that might surpass or complement AI in various domains.
- Kass's optimism about AI improving human life and solving global issues is based on a naive and unrealistic view of how technology can address complex social, political, economic, and environmental challenges. It overlooks the potential negative impacts of AI on human autonomy, privacy, dignity, democracy, and justice.
- Kass's belief that AI will lead to more fulfilling, joyful lives with less suffering is a subjective and emotional judgment that does not account for individual preferences, values, and experiences. It also assumes that the definition of fulfillment and happiness can be universally applied and measured by AI.
- Kass's mention of exploring other worlds and galaxies as a result of AI is a vague and unsubstantiated claim that does not explain how or why AI would enable such feats. It also ignores the ethical, practical, and existential implications of extraterrestrial contact or colonization.
- Kass's acknowledgment of the risks and challenges of AI is a partial and superficial recognition that fails to capture the scope, severity, and urgency of the issues at hand. He dismisses the alignment problem as something that can be solved, while it remains one of the most daunting and debated questions in AI research and ethics.
- Kass's identification of compute deficit, energy deficit, and over-regulation or bad policy as obstacles to building AGI is a simplistic and incomplete analysis that does not address other possible factors, such as technical limitations, theoretical barriers, ethical dilemmas, social consequences, or human choices.
- Kass's emphasis on effective policy in managing the potential negative impacts of AI is a contradictory and inconsistent stance that contrasts with his previous role at OpenAI, which has been criticized for being opaque, secretive, and unaccountable in its research and development practices.
- Kass's reference to OpenAI's recent efforts to promote responsible AI use is a self-serving and biased remark that does not acknowledge the criticism and controversy surrounding OpenAI's motives, methods, and goals. It also ignores the potential conflicts of interest and power dynamics that might influence Kass's perspective and agenda.