Sure, I'd be happy to explain this in a simple way!

So, you know how when you go to school or work, there's always a building where everyone goes? That's what an office is - a big house where people from the same company go every day.

Now imagine all those offices are connected by these invisible paths called "networks". These paths let them share things like toys (or in grown-up talk, "data") and play together (or "collaborate").

Sometimes, these networks also help connect us to other parts of the world. For example, when you're doing your homework on your tablet at home, you might be using a network that connects to big computers called "servers" to look up information.

So, a system is like all these connected offices and paths where things happen - people share information, work together, and even play (grown-ups call it "games", but it's still fun!). Read from source...

Based on the provided text about Walmart's new headquarters, here are some potential criticisms, biases, or irrational arguments that a reader might highlight:

1. **Lack of Specific Details**: The article does not provide any specific details about the headquarters' design, sustainability features, or timeline for completion. This lack of concrete information could be seen as an oversight or an attempt to generate hype without substance.

2. **Use of Superlatives**: Phrases like "most advanced," "most inspiring," and "most sustainable" might come off as hyperbolic and biased, as they are not backed by any comparatives or standards. A critic might argue that these claims are made to create a positive image rather than accurately representing the headquarters.

3. **Assumption of Walmart's Commitment**: The article assumes Walmart's commitment to sustainability based on its past actions, but it does not acknowledge any past controversies or criticism related to environmental issues. This could be seen as ignoring counterarguments and presenting an irrationally positive view of the company.

4. **Emotional Language**: Phrases like "thrilled," "humbled," and "tremendous" might evoke emotional responses, but they do not add any substantial information about the headquarters or Walmart's plans. A critic might argue that this language is used to manipulate reader's emotions rather than inform them.

5. **Focus on appearances**: The emphasis on how the headquarters will look and feel might suggest that the company is more focused on public image than practical considerations, like how the design will actually improve employees' work lives or reduce environmental impact.

6. **Lack of Employee Perspectives**: The article focuses solely on Walmart's statements, without including any perspectives from employees who will be working in the new headquarters. This could lead to questions about whether the headquarters is truly designed with employee needs and wants in mind.

Positive. The article discusses the new headquarters of Walmart Inc., highlighting its eco-friendliness, employee benefits, and community engagement efforts, all of which reflect positively on the company.

Keywords indicating a positive sentiment include:

* "state-of-the-art" ( Used to describe the new headquarters)
* "sustainable" (referring to energy efficiency and use of renewable materials)
* "wellbeing" (in context of employee wellness facilities and initiatives)
* "community-focused" (describing the company's efforts to engage with and benefit the local community)