Whales are people who buy or sell a lot of stocks at once. They are called whales because they have big money and can make big moves in the market. The article is about what these whales are doing with a company called Monday.Com, which is traded on a big stock market called NASDAQ under the symbol MNDY.

Summary for 7 years old:
Some really rich people bought or sold a lot of shares of Monday.Com, and this article tells us what they did and why it might be important. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that there are some secretive or influential investors who are making big bets on Monday.Com (NASDAQ:MNDY) stock, but does not provide any evidence or details to support this claim. A more accurate title could be "Some Investors Are Buying and Selling Monday.Com Stock" or "A Brief Overview of Monday.Com's Recent Trading Activity".
2. The article is poorly structured and lacks coherence. It jumps from one topic to another without explaining the connection or relevance. For example, it mentions Benzinga's research services, then abruptly switches to insider trades, then binary options, then CME Group, etc. A logical flow of information would help readers understand the main points and arguments of the article better.
3. The article contains several factual errors and inaccuracies. For instance, it claims that Monday.Com is a project management software company, but does not provide any proof or examples to back this up. In reality, Monday.Com offers a cloud-based work operating system that integrates various tools and features for team collaboration, planning, automation, etc. The article also states that Monday.Com has a market cap of $1.4 billion, but does not cite the source or date of this information. As of May 25th, 2021, Monday.Com's market cap was actually $9.6 billion, according to Google Finance.
4. The article uses vague and ambiguous language that makes it hard for readers to discern the author's opinion or perspective. For example, it says that "whales" are betting on Monday.Com, but does not define what a whale is or how much money they have invested in the stock. It also uses terms like "big players", "smart money", and "influential investors" without specifying who they are or why they matter. The article could benefit from more clarity and transparency in its language and tone.
5. The article relies heavily on external sources and links, but does not provide any critical analysis or evaluation of them. It simply copy-pastes the information from other websites without checking for accuracy, credibility, or relevance. A good practice would be to cite the original source, summarize the main points, and compare them with other sources to verify the validity and reliability of the data.