Alright, imagine you're playing a game of tag at school. Everyone is running around trying to avoid being tagged.

1. **System**: That's like the rules and people in charge of the game. In this case, it's the computers, algorithms, and people who run stock markets where people buy and sell shares of companies.

2. **News**: Now, think about when recess is over and your teacher comes to tell everyone that they have to go back to class because there was an emergency drill or something important happened in the school. That news makes you all stop playing tag and rush inside quickly, right?

3. **"News impacts System"**: So, in the game of stocks, **news** can also make people want to stop what they're doing (buying or selling shares) and do something else quickly. For example, let's say there's big news that a company found out about a new amazing toy it can make. Everyone hears this news at the same time, so many people rush to buy shares of that company really fast because they think the price will go up.

4. **Benzinga**: Lastly, Benzinga is like a really helpful friend who always tells you what's going on in your favorite games during recess and helps you understand why everyone's doing what they're doing. In the game of stocks, it gives news about different companies and markets to help people make smarter decisions when playing.

So, in simple terms, "News impacts System" just means that when something important happens (like big news), it makes a lot of people want to do things differently really fast! Read from source...

Based on your summary of AI's critical perspective, here are the key points he might have focused on regarding Jim Cramer and Benzinga:

1. **Inconsistencies in Advice:**
- Criticizing Cramer for contradicting earlier advice or predictions.
- Highlighting instances where Cramer has recommended selling a stock one day and then buying it the next.

2. **Biases and Conflicts of Interest:**
- Allegations of bias in recommendations, often favoring certain companies or sectors due to personal holdings or industry connections.
- Critiquing Benzinga's financial incentives and conflicts of interest in providing analysis and advice.

3. **Irrational Arguments:**
- Calling out Cramer for making arguments based on gut feelings, personal anecdotes, or popular opinion rather than rigorous analysis or data.
- Challenging Cramer's interpretations of market trends, company news, or economic indicators that seem to defy logical explanations.

4. **Emotional Behavior:**
- Commenting on Cramer's emotional nature during segments like "Mad Money," suggesting that this may lead to impulsive advice rather than well-researched guidance.
- Criticizing Benzinga for perpetuating hype and emotional investing through its content and platform features.

5. **Lack of Transparency:**
- Arguing that Cramer and Benzinga are not sufficiently transparent about their decisions, holdings, or errors in analysis.
- Calling for clearer disclosure of potential conflicts of interest and a process for correcting erroneous information.

6. **Over-reliance on Hype and Clickbait:**
- Criticizing Benzinga's tendency to use sensational headlines and clickbait tactics to attract traffic at the cost of delivering quality, in-depth analysis.
- Commenting on Cramer's role in driving this hype culture within the content.

Based on the article, the sentiment is **bullish**. Here are a few reasons:

1. The article starts by mentioning that Apple Inc.'s stock price has increased, suggesting positive momentum.
2. It mentions that "System1" has identified AAPL as one of the best stocks to invest in, indicating a positive view on the company's prospects.
3. There is no mention of any significant risks or negative developments regarding Apple or its stock.

These points indicate an overall bullish sentiment in the article about Apple Inc.'s stock.