A person who is very good at guessing how much money people can make from buying and selling stocks shared his ideas about some companies. He thinks one company, called NVIDIA, will do well and its price will go up by around 31%. He also gave suggestions for five other companies that he believes are good to invest in. His guesses are usually right 88% of the time. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and exaggerated, as it claims that the analyst with 88% accuracy rate sees around 31% upside in Nvidia, but does not mention how this percentage was calculated or what time frame it refers to. This could lead to confusion and misunderstanding among readers who are interested in investing in Nvidia.
- The article is filled with promotional content for Benzinga Pro, which is a paid service that provides access to analyst ratings, news, scanners, and chat power. This creates a conflict of interest, as the author tries to persuade readers to subscribe to this service by highlighting its benefits and offering a limited time deal at half-price. However, there is no evidence or data provided to support the claim that Benzinga Pro can help users win more in the stock market.
- The article relies heavily on ratings changes from major sell-side banks, which are not always accurate or reliable sources of information. The author does not disclose how these ratings are obtained, who is behind them, and what methodology they use to assign them. Moreover, the author does not acknowledge that these ratings can be influenced by various factors, such as market sentiment, corporate actions, earnings surprises, etc., which may not reflect the true value of the stocks.
- The article mentions five top analyst picks from Wall Street's most accurate analysts, but does not provide any details or explanations for their choices. The author only cites the name of the analyst, the firm, the ratings accuracy, and the latest rating, without giving any reasons or arguments to justify why these stocks are worth buying. This leaves readers with no insight into the rationale behind the picks, and makes them rely on blind faith and trust in the experts.