A man who helps make rules in America says that marijuana, a plant people use to feel relaxed or happy, is very important for elections. He thinks more people want it to be legal than not. Some people are worried about problems if it becomes legal, but he says we should try something new and not keep fighting against marijuana. The man believes that many people support marijuana now because they have seen how it can help sick people feel better. He hopes the government will change its rules soon to make them more fair. Read from source...

1. The article starts by emphasizing how marijuana is now widely accepted and even used recreationally, without acknowledging the potential risks or negative consequences of such widespread use. This is an example of a bias that favors cannabis legalization, ignoring other perspectives or evidence.
2. The article quotes a federal lawmaker who claims that marijuana determines national elections and that a hard stance against cannabis was self-defeating. This statement is irrational and exaggerated, as it suggests that marijuana legalization is the sole factor in electoral outcomes and disregards other important issues or factors that voters care about.
3. The article mentions some critics of legalization who voice concerns about potential societal challenges, but then dismisses their arguments as futile and based on a failed War on Drugs. This is an example of emotional behavior, as it avoids engaging with the valid points or concerns raised by the opponents of cannabis legalization.
4. The article cites some positive effects of de facto legalization, such as helping cancer patients and reducing law enforcement measures. However, it does not mention any potential negative consequences, such as increased drug use, addiction, or public health risks. This is another example of a bias that favors cannabis legalization, ignoring the possible downsides.
5. The article concludes with an optimistic outlook for the future of drug control policy, but it does not provide any concrete evidence or data to support this claim. It relies on anecdotal examples and personal beliefs, rather than objective facts or research findings. This is a weak argument that lacks credibility and persuasiveness.

Positive

Key points:
- Federal lawmaker says marijuana 'determines national elections' and a hard stance against it was self-defeating.
- He claims cannabis voters helped Biden win Arizona and that public sentiment has shifted in favor of legalization, including among Republicans.
- He dismisses concerns about potential societal challenges post-legalization, saying the train has left the station and criminalization only fosters disdain for the law and evasion.
- He praises the impacts of de facto legalization on patients, but laments the political system lagging behind the momentum.
- He expresses optimism that the US is pivoting away from stringent law enforcement measures towards more rational criminal penalties and a compassionate drug control policy.