Alright, imagine you're playing a game, but instead of a friend helping you, you have a special robot helper. This robot can do tasks on its own, like finding information or even talking to other people to get things done. That's what they mean by "agents" in this story.

Right now, we have chatbots like ChatGPT that help us talk to computers more easily. But some people think the next big thing is these independent helpers - agents - that can do all sorts of tasks without needing us to tell them everything step-by-step.

People are saying that even though chatbots are cool, they're not replacing doctors or fixing climate change yet. We still need real people and smart scientists for those things. Read from source...

Based on your instructions to highlight inconsistencies, biases, irrational arguments, and emotional behavior in the given text, here are my findings:

1. **Inconsistencies:**
- The author starts by mentioning AI tools like ChatGPT but then shifts focus to agents without clearly defining how they differ or relate to these tools.
- Marc Benioff, Salesforce CEO, initially says "we are not at" the point of AI takeover, but later in the text, it's mentioned that Microsoft will allow businesses to create their own autonomous AI agents starting in November.

2. **Biases:**
- The author seemingly tries to downplay the impact and capabilities of AI, stating things like "AI has not taken over," "AI has not cured cancer," and "Is AI curing climate change? No." However, they do not provide any significant counterarguments or evidence to support these statements.
- There's a subtle bias towards business-oriented applications of AI (like customer service functions) while glossing over other potential use cases.

3. **Irrational Arguments:**
- The author presents extreme scenarios (e.g., the takeover depicted in movies) as representations of current day AI capabilities without providing any rational argument that these scenarios are imminent or even plausible.
- Tone-deaf comparison: "ChatGPT-maker OpenAI is also reportedly planning the launch of its own set of agents." This casual mention follows serious concerns raised about OpenAI's responsible use of power, lack of transparency, and potential impacts on society.

4. **Emotional Behavior:**
- The text contains emotional language, such as "crazy movies" (referring to AI takeover depictions), which does not add much value to the discussion.
- The author expresses relief that the AI depicted in "those crazy movies has not come true yet," indicating an emotional investment in presenting AI as less advanced and threatening than it's often portrayed.