So, there's a TV show where people talk about different companies and whether they are doing well or not. They sometimes tell us what they think we should do with our money based on that. In this article, they talked about a few big companies and what they think about them. They said that some of these companies made more money than people expected and that's good. They also said that some people think these companies are a good place to put our money because they think they will make even more money in the future. They want us to know about these ideas so we can make better choices with our money too. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading: it implies that the author has "personal story critics" about the article, but it doesn't explain what those critics are or how they relate to the article.
- The author's personal story is not relevant to the topic of the article, which is about CNBC's "Final Trades" and the stocks they recommend. The author's personal story should be kept separate from the analysis of the stocks.
- The author's tone is emotional and defensive, as if he is trying to justify his own stock picks or argue against the "Final Trades" recommendations. This is not a professional or objective way to write about the topic.
- The author's analysis of the stocks is superficial and does not provide any evidence or reasoning to support his claims. For example, he says that Lockheed Martin "beat market estimates" but does not explain how much they beat them by or why that is significant. He also says that TE Connectivity "posted mixed results" but does not elaborate on what those results were or how they affected the stock's performance.
- The author's research is not credible or reliable. He cites Benzinga APIs as his source, which is a website that provides stock market news and data. However, he does not link to the original article or provide any other sources of information. This makes it difficult to verify his claims or check his sources.

In conclusion, the article story critics are not helpful or informative. They are based on the author's personal story, which is irrelevant to the topic of the article, and his emotional and superficial analysis of the stocks. The research is not credible or reliable, and the tone is unprofessional and defensive. The article should be rewritten to focus on the stocks and their performance, and to provide objective and evidence-based analysis.

This is an article about CNBC's "Halftime Report Final Trades" where different analysts and investors share their final trades for the day. To determine the sentiment of the article, we need to analyze the tone and the content of the article.

The article starts by mentioning the earnings and revenue beats of Lockheed Martin, TE Connectivity, and The Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund. These are all positive statements that indicate a bullish sentiment towards these stocks. The article also mentions the price actions of these stocks, which are mostly positive as well.

The only negative statement in the article is about the missed revenue of TE Connectivity, but this is followed by a positive statement about the company's adjusted earnings beat. Therefore, the overall sentiment of the article is bullish, as it highlights the positive aspects of these stocks and their performances.

### Final answer: Bullish

Lockheed Martin: The company reported strong earnings and revenue, beating analyst estimates. The stock has a market capitalization of $102.46 billion and a price-to-earnings ratio of 30.16. The aerospace and defense sector is influenced by government spending and geopolitical events. The stock has a one-year target estimate of $533.11, according to analysts polled by Benzinga.

TE Connectivity: The company reported mixed results for the third quarter, with adjusted earnings beating estimates but sales missing expectations. The stock has a market capitalization of $57.39 billion and a price-to-earnings ratio of 20.61. The company is a global leader in connectivity and sensors, serving various industries such as automotive, industrial, and communications. The stock has a one-year target estimate of $167.73, according to analysts polled by Benzinga.