A company called SEI Investments made more money than people thought they would in the last three months. They also had more money to take care of for their clients and more things for their clients to invest in. But they had to spend more money too. People think the company is doing well and will keep doing well. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalized, implying that SEI Investments had a negative earnings surprise when in fact it beat earnings estimates.
- The article uses vague and irrelevant terms like "psychedelics" and "crypto cannabis" to attract attention, but they have no connection to the company or the earnings report.
- The article fails to provide any quantitative analysis or comparison to the consensus estimate or the previous year's results, making it difficult for readers to understand the company's performance and why it is a "beat."
- The article focuses on the increase in revenues and AUM, but does not explain how these factors contributed to the earnings beat, or what challenges the company faces due to higher expenses and fee-based revenues.
- The article includes a large, unrelated image at the top, which slows down the loading time and distracts from the main content.
- The article ends with a promotional call to action for Benzinga's services, which is irrelevant and inappropriate for an earnings report.

### Final answer: AI's article is poorly written, misleading, and lacks substance. It does not provide useful information for investors or readers.