Big banks had some extra costs in the last part of 2023 that made their earnings look lower than expected. These costs were one-time things and not regular expenses. Even though they had these costs, the economy was doing better than people thought it would. So, the banks are still strong and making money, but the costs hid how well they did. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that one-time charges were used to manipulate the perception of how well big banks did during the last quarter of 2023, rather than acknowledging that they are a normal part of accounting and reporting practices.
- The article uses vague terms like "disappointing news" and "surprising resilience" without providing any specific evidence or analysis to support these claims. This makes the article sound subjective and unreliable as a source of information.
- The article focuses too much on the comparison between this quarter and last year's quarter, rather than comparing the performance across different quarters within 2023. This creates a distorted picture of how well the banks are doing, since one-time charges can vary significantly from quarter to quarter depending on various factors.
- The article does not provide any context or background information about the reasons behind the one-time charges or the economic conditions in 2023 that might have affected the banks' performance. This makes it difficult for readers to understand the underlying causes and implications of the financial results.
- The article ends abruptly without concluding or summarizing the main points. It leaves readers hanging with unanswered questions about the overall performance and outlook of the big banks in 2023.

Negative
Reasoning: The article discusses how one-time charges affected the earnings of big banks and made their results look worse than they actually are. This implies a negative sentiment towards the banks' performance during the last quarter of 2023, as it suggests that they faced unexpected challenges and did not meet analysts' expectations. Additionally, the title of the article also indicates a negative tone by using words such as "concealed" and "disappointing".