A man who knows a lot about TV companies thinks that Disney's boss, Bob Iger, is good but the people who help him make decisions are too nice to him. He says they should listen more and maybe let someone new join them. One of the things he doesn't like is when Disney bought another big company called Fox, because it wasn't a good idea. Read from source...

1. The article is poorly structured and lacks clarity in presenting the main points. It jumps from one topic to another without providing a coherent narrative or logical flow of ideas. This makes it difficult for readers to follow and understand the author's arguments.
2. The title is misleading and sensationalist, as it implies that the Disney board has been completely submissive towards Iger, while in reality, there may be some disagreements or differing opinions among the board members. A more accurate title would reflect the complexity of the situation and acknowledge different perspectives.
3. The article relies heavily on quotations from Tom Rogers, without providing adequate context or background information about his credentials, expertise, or potential biases. This makes it hard for readers to evaluate the credibility and validity of his claims. A more balanced approach would include other sources or viewpoints that challenge or support Rogers' opinions.
4. The article does not provide enough evidence or analysis to support the assertion that the 21st Century Fox acquisition was "really not a good acquisition". It cites Rogers' opinion, but does not examine the financial performance, strategic rationale, or other factors that may have influenced the decision-making process. A more thorough evaluation would consider both the strengths and weaknesses of the deal and its impact on Disney's overall business strategy.
5. The article uses emotive language and subjective terms, such as "deferential", "wrong", or "not a good acquisition", which may reflect the author's personal opinions or biases rather than objective facts. This can undermine the credibility of the article and create a polarizing effect among readers who may have different views on the topic. A more objective and balanced tone would enhance the quality of the writing and foster constructive dialogue.