Some people made a lot of money by buying a new digital coin called SatoshiVM before it became popular. This has worried some others who think this is not fair and can cause problems in the world of digital coins. Read from source...

- The article does not provide any clear definition or explanation of what snipers are and how they operate in the crypto market. It assumes that the reader already knows this concept and jumps to describing their impact on token launches. This is a poor writing technique that fails to engage and inform the audience effectively.
- The article uses vague terms such as "raising concerns" and "potential risks" without providing any specific or credible sources to support these claims. It also relies heavily on ratings from rug.ai, which may not be a reliable or independent source of information for crypto investors.
- The article focuses too much on the profitability of the snipers and the SAVM team, without considering the broader implications of their actions for the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem and the cryptocurrency community as a whole. It also ignores the possibility that some snipers may be providing legitimate liquidity or value to the market, rather than simply profiting from it.
- The article concludes with a cliché statement about the need for vigilance and transparency in the crypto market, without offering any concrete suggestions or solutions for how to achieve this goal. It also implies that snipers are somehow responsible for the concentration of tokens and their potential AIgers, rather than acknowledging that other factors such as tokenomics, governance, and investor behavior may also play a role in this phenomenon.