A big boss called Jeff Bezos, who is in charge of a company named Amazon, was asked questions by some people from FTC. They wanted to know if he deleted messages on his phone that could be important for their investigation. He used an app called Signal that makes messages disappear after they are read. The FTC bosses were not happy because they think Jeff might have hidden some messages on purpose. Jeff said he tried very hard not to use the app for any important stuff, but he may have made mistakes sometimes. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and sensationalist, implying that Bezos was grilled by the FTC over using Signal's auto-delete feature, when in reality, he was questioned about his deletion of messages relevant to an antitrust lawsuit. This creates a false impression that Bezos did something wrong or unethical by using Signal, rather than focusing on the actual issue at hand.
2. The article repeatedly refers to Amazon's antitrust suit as "ongoing", despite it being filed in December 2021 and having no clear indication of when or if it will be resolved. This suggests a lack of current awareness and attention to detail by the author, which undermines their credibility.
3. The article uses quotations from Bezos' testimony without providing context or explanation for his statements, such as why he may have continued to use Signal for sensitive company issues unrelated to the lawsuit, or what legal advice he received from Amazon's lawyers. This leaves readers with incomplete and potentially misleading information about Bezos' actions and intentions.
4. The article also quotes an FTC lawyer who points out that Bezos continued to use Signal's disappearing messaging feature despite receiving document-preservation notices in 2020 and 2021. However, the author does not mention that Bezos stated he tried very hard to be careful and only used disappearing messages for things that were not responsive to these requests. This omission paints a more negative picture of Bezos' behavior than is warranted by the evidence presented in the article.
5. The article concludes with an irrelevant and unsubstantiated claim that "it just doesn't make sense" for Bezos to use Signal for discussing any complicated business issues, implying that he acted irrationally or recklessly. This statement is subjective and not supported by the facts presented in the article, and it detracts from the overall quality of the analysis.