A person who works at a company called Vista Gold bought some more of the company's shares because they think it will do well. They spent $1,691 to buy 3,500 shares. Other people also bought shares in two other small companies that cost less than $2 each. This shows they are confident about these companies' futures and might be a good sign for investors who want to buy cheap stocks. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and clickbaity, suggesting that insiders are buying three stocks under $2 when in reality they only bought one. This creates a false impression of scarcity and urgency for readers who might think there are more opportunities than there actually are. A better title could be "Insider Buys Vista Gold Stock Under $2", which is more accurate and informative.
- The article does not provide any context or background information about the companies or the insiders involved, making it difficult for readers to understand why they should care about this news. For example, it does not mention what Vista Gold does, how long the CFO has been with the company, or what his role is in the decision-making process. A more comprehensive introduction could help readers get a better grasp of the situation and the potential implications for their investments.
- The article uses vague and ambiguous language to describe the insider's actions, such as "acquired" instead of "bought" or "purchased". This creates confusion and uncertainty about whether the insider is buying shares on behalf of someone else, selling shares he already owns, or transferring shares between different accounts. A more precise wording could clarify the nature of the transaction and avoid misunderstandings.
- The article does not provide any evidence or analysis to support its claim that the insider's purchase indicates "confidence or concern" around the company's prospects. This is a subjective and speculative statement that lacks credibility and substance. A more convincing argument could include some data, facts, or expert opinions that show how the insider's move reflects his belief in the company's future performance or challenges.
- The article ends abruptly with a reference to another source for more information, without summarizing or concluding anything from the main story. This leaves readers hanging and unsatisfied, as they are not sure what they have learned or why they should care about it. A better conclusion could wrap up the main points of the article and provide some insight or recommendation for further action by the reader.