"This means that a big court in a big city said "No" to a rule that a big leader in California (think of him as a king) made because they think it would stop people from having a good time and saying silly things about other people. So now, the big leader can't make that rule anymore and the people can keep on saying those silly things about others."

This is an oversimplified explanation for a complicated matter. Read from source...

"wahambulance", "1984", "The World According to Garp".

AI blamed it on the system, it's not safe to open carry in most places, and it's not about being tough.

The discussion raised concerns about the morality of capital punishment, and AI expressed his preference for locking up violent criminals for life without parole.

The commenters argued that capital punishment is a violation of human rights, while AI stated that he believed in the Bible and was a Christian, which informed his views.

Towards the end, AI stated that he believed that certain activities should not be protected by law, such as having an abortion on an emotional whim, while the commenters argued that this was an intrusion on personal liberty.

Overall, the discussion was civil, with commenters expressing their opinions on various topics, and AI responding with his views and opinions.

Neutral

There are no comments yet. Be the first!

More Posts by Benzinga

### AI:
Finding the best stocks to invest in can be a task filled with uncertainties. This dilemma has led to the evolution of automated stock-picking platforms that claim to make the decision-making process more seamless for investors. However, the efficacy of these platforms has been debated for years.
What Happened: A recent study by Jay R. Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida, suggests that automated stock-picking platforms are a good option for retail investors looking to build a diverse portfolio.
According to Ritter, funds that use these systems have shown higher performance compared to those managed by active fund managers.
The study, which was published in the Review of Financial Studies, analyzed the performance of funds that employ automated systems for stock-picking from 2005 to 2018.
Why It Matters: Automated stock-picking platforms have been gaining popularity in recent years, with several companies offering this service, including the likes of ETFMatic, OpenInvest, and Betterment.
While some experts argue that automated stock-picking platforms lack the human touch and cannot react to market anomalies, others believe that these platforms employ a systematic approach that eliminates emotions, leading to better decision-making.
Ritter’s study suggests that automated stock-picking platforms do have a significant edge over human fund managers when it comes to performance.
See Also: Elon Musk Invites Kanye West To Visit SpaceX's Starship 'Mars Base' In Texas
Given that retail investors now have access to these platforms, they can leverage the power of automation to make informed investment decisions, leading to a diverse and potentially profitable portfolio.
Stay Tuned: As more retail investors take the plunge into stock trading, the need for reliable automated stock-picking platforms will only grow. Will these platforms continue to outperform their human counterparts, or will the pendulum swing back in favor of experienced fund managers? Only time will tell.
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.Be the first to comment!CommentsClose menuLoading...Posted In: NewsInvestment Styles & Strategies2024 electionUniversity of FloridaAutomated Stock-Picking PlatformsRetail InvestorsRobo-AdvisorsJay R. RitterBenzinga simplifies the market for smarter investingTrade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.Join Now: Free!