This article is about comparing how well different companies that make things are doing this year, and if one called ABB is doing better than the others. It also talks about another company named Bodycote, which is similar to ABB but not as big or famous. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that industrial products stocks are lagging ABB specifically this year, when in fact the article does not provide any comparative analysis or evidence of such performance difference between the two.
2. The author does not define what it means for a stock to be "lagging" or how they measured this concept. Is it based on share price, earnings, revenue, market cap, dividend yield, or something else? How are these metrics normalized and compared across different companies and sectors?
3. The article does not provide any context or background information about ABB, Bodycote, or the Industrial Products group as a whole. What are their business models, markets, competitors, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats? How do they fit into the broader economic and industry trends?
4. The article does not mention any specific reasons why ABB might be outperforming or underperforming its peers in the Industrial Products group. What are the key drivers of their performance, such as product innovation, customer loyalty, cost efficiency, strategic partnerships, regulatory changes, geopolitical factors, etc.? How do these factors vary across different companies and sectors?
5. The article does not provide any data or sources to support its claims or opinions. Where are the charts, tables, statistics, quotes, references, or links that demonstrate the year-to-date performance of ABB and Bodycote, as well as their comparison with other industrial products stocks? How credible and reliable are these data sources?
6. The article has a subjective and opinionated tone, which may reflect the author's personal bias, agenda, or lack of expertise. It uses words like "plenty", "always", "great", "outperforming", "should", etc. that imply a value judgment or recommendation without providing any objective evidence or analysis.
7. The article does not offer any actionable advice or suggestions for investors who are interested in the industrial products sector. It does not provide any recommendations, tips, strategies, warnings, or opportunities based on its findings or conclusions.