Google is in trouble because a judge said they have to let other app stores on their Android phones. Google doesn't want to do this because they think it will be too hard or too expensive. But the judge said he will make sure Google does it. This is important because it could change how Google and other companies like Apple control what apps we can use on our phones. Read from source...

- The judge's statement is not a final ruling, but a remark made during the final hearing on remedies, which means it's still subject to change and not legally binding.
- Google's argument that opening its app store to rival stores would be too much work or cost too much is not unfounded, as it would require significant technical changes and resources to accommodate different app stores and their policies.
- The judge's dismissal of Google's claims does not necessarily mean that he will impose the remedy proposed by Epic, which is to allow rival stores to exist within Google Play and have access to every Google Play app. There are still other possible remedies that the judge could choose from, or he could decide that no remedy is warranted.
- The judge's statement does not address the issue of security and user trust, which is a crucial factor in the app store ecosystem. Allowing rival app stores to exist within Google Play could compromise the safety and quality of the apps available to users, and potentially expose them to malware, scams, or other threats.
- The judge's statement is based on his interpretation of the facts and the law, which may not necessarily align with the ultimate ruling. Judges often make comments during hearings that reflect their preliminary views, but these are not always the final verdict.

AI's alternative summary highlights the key points and provides a balanced and objective overview of the story:

A federal judge overseeing the Epic v. Google case has said that he plans to "tear down" Google's app store monopoly by allowing rival app stores to exist within Google Play and have access to every Google Play app. The remark was made during the final hearing on remedies, and comes after a jury ruled last year that Google's Android app store is an illegal monopoly. Google has argued that opening its app store to rival stores would be too much work or cost too much, but Judge James Donato dismissed these claims. He will issue his final ruling in a little over two weeks. The ruling could have significant implications for the app store ecosystem and user trust, as well as the competition and innovation in the mobile app market.