Some people were talking to a computer program called ChatGPT, which can Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist, suggesting that the Welsh responses are either a bug, a feature, or a hallucination, without providing any clear evidence or explanation for any of these possibilities.
- The article body starts by describing the incident as "stunning" users, which implies a negative or surprising reaction, but does not provide any quotes or details from the users or the chatbot itself.
- The article then quotes Financial Times, but does not link to the original source or provide any context for the quote, making it seem like the author's own opinion or interpretation.
- The article then goes on to mention other controversies and problems surrounding OpenAI, without providing any clear connection or relevance to the Welsh language issue, and without acknowledging any positive aspects or achievements of the company.
- The article ends with a shameless promotion of Benzinga's services, which seems out of place and inappropriate for a news article.

Overall, the article is poorly written, unprofessional, and biased, and does not provide a fair or accurate representation of the incident or the company.

neutral
Article's Topic: OpenAI's ChatGPT, Welsh language, bug, feature, hallucination
Article's Keywords: OpenAI, ChatGPT, Welsh language, bug, feature, hallucination