A man named David Einhorn says that the stock market is not working well because people are not looking at each company's value. Instead, they are just following a plan or a computer program to buy and sell. This makes it hard for him and his company to find good deals. He also said that some parts of the market are too expensive because these plans and computers only care about quick gains. Even though his company did better last year, he still had some losses from betting against overpriced stocks. Other important people who invest money agree with him. Read from source...

- The headline is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Einhorn is the only one who thinks the stock market is broken, but he is just expressing his own opinion. A more accurate title would be "David Einhorn Shares His Concerns About The Stock Market And Passive Trading".
- The article focuses too much on Einhorn's personal investment firm and its performance, rather than the broader implications of his views on the market. This makes it seem like a promotional piece for Greenlight Capital, rather than an objective analysis of Einhorn's arguments.
- The article does not provide enough context or evidence to support Einhorn's claims that passive and algorithmic trading are destroying the value industry. It cites no data or research to back up his assertions, nor does it address potential counterarguments or alternative perspectives. This makes the article seem biased and one-sided, rather than informative and balanced.
- The article uses emotional language and hyperbole to emphasize Einhorn's points, such as "annihilated", "disproportionate buying", and "limited by significant losses". These words create a sense of urgency and drama, but they do not accurately reflect the reality or complexity of the situation. They also make the article seem more opinion-driven than fact-based, which undermines its credibility and usefulness as a source of information.