Some important people in three companies bought more of their own company's shares. This means they believe the companies will do well and the shares will be worth more money later. One company, Tile Shop Holdings, sells tiles and other stuff for floors and walls. Another company, Edgewise Therapeutics, tries to make medicine for people with rare muscle problems. The third company is not mentioned in the article. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that insiders buying stocks is a rare or significant event, when in fact it happens quite frequently and may not indicate anything about the company's future performance. A more accurate title would be something like "Insiders Buy Shares of Edgewise Therapeutics And 2 Other Stocks".
2. The article does not provide any context or background information on why insiders might buy shares of these companies, such as their personal interests, affiliations, or strategic plans. This makes it hard for readers to understand the motivation behind the insider buying and evaluate its relevance for their own investment decisions.
3. The article focuses mainly on the amount of money spent by the insiders, which is not a meaningful metric for assessing the value or potential of these stocks. A more relevant factor would be the percentage of shares owned by each insider, as this reflects their confidence and commitment to the company's success.
4. The article does not mention any other sources of information or analysis that support or challenge the claims made about these stocks, such as analyst reports, earnings estimates, clinical trial results, or market trends. This leaves readers with a biased and incomplete picture of the companies and their prospects.
5. The article uses emotional language and exaggerated expressions, such as "best", "top", "hottest", or "explosive", to persuade readers to buy these stocks without providing any evidence or reasoning. This is a classic example of clickbait journalism that exploits human emotions and impulses rather than informing and educating them.