A company called OpenAI, which makes smart computer programs, is in a big fight with another company called the New York Times. The New York Times says that OpenAI copied their stories and used them without permission. But OpenAI's boss says they don't need the New York Times' stories to work well, and some other newspapers are happy to work with them. There are also other people who say OpenAI wrote things that looked too much like their own stories, but OpenAI is still trying to make deals with more newspapers to use their stuff. Read from source...

- The headline is misleading and sensationalized, implying that the OpenAI CEO denies any need for New York Times data at all, rather than just being selective about it.
- The article fails to mention that OpenAI has already secured access to some news content from other publishers, such as Bloomberg, Fox Corp., and Axel Springer SE, which contradicts the claim that they are desperate for NYT data.
- The article also omits the fact that OpenAI is negotiating with NYT to gain access to their archives, but the talks have not reached a conclusion yet, so there is no clear rejection or acceptance from either party.
- The article does not provide any evidence or quotations from the OpenAI CEO's statements, making it seem like an unsubstantiated rumor rather than a factual report.
- The article repeatedly uses negative and hostile language to describe OpenAI's actions and intentions, such as "copyright infringement", "lawsuit", "allegations", "bugs", etc., which creates a bias against OpenAI and casts them in an unfavorable light.
- The article does not explore the potential benefits or implications of having AI models like ChatGPT access to diverse and comprehensive news sources, such as improving natural language understanding, summarization, analysis, and generation, which could be seen as a positive development for both users and publishers.