The article talks about five things to know in investing this week. It says that the people who control money in the US (the Federal Reserve) did something surprising by not changing how much they charge banks for borrowing money. This made some people happy because it means they think the economy is doing well, but others were disappointed because they wanted them to do more to help businesses and people. The article also talks about other things that can affect investing, like how many jobs are being created, how much oil costs, and how popular online education is becoming. Read from source...

- The author begins with an attention-grabbing headline that implies there are five important things to know in investing this week. However, the body of the text does not deliver on this promise. Instead, it focuses primarily on one issue - the Federal Reserve's decision to leave interest rates unchanged and the market reaction to it.
- The author fails to provide a clear and concise summary of why the Fed decided to maintain its current policy stance. He mentions that the economy is strong, but does not explain how or why this supports keeping rates on hold. Additionally, he does not address potential risks or downsides to this decision, such as inflationary pressures or financial stability concerns.
- The author expresses a personal opinion about the Fed's decision, stating that it was "shocking" and that the market was disappointed. However, he does not provide any evidence or analysis to back up this claim. He simply states his own emotional reaction to the news. This is not a helpful or informative way to communicate with readers who are looking for objective and well-reasoned insights into the investment landscape.
- The author briefly mentions two other topics - oil prices and online education - but does not provide any details or analysis on why these issues are relevant or important for investors. He simply states that he is bullish on both, without explaining his reasoning or providing any supporting data. This leaves readers with more questions than answers.
- The author ends the article by encouraging readers to follow him on social media and subscribe to his newsletter. While this may be a way to build his personal brand and generate revenue, it does not add value for readers who are looking for useful and actionable information about investing. It also detracts from the credibility of the article as a whole.

### Final answer: The author's story is poorly written, lacks substance, and fails to deliver on its promise of providing five key things to know in investing this week.