Some companies did not do well in the stock market today. Their shares became worth less money, and people are worried about how they will do in the future. One company that makes computer chips, Lattice Semiconductor, did not do well because they did not make as much money as people thought they would. Other companies, like Symbotic and Woodward, also did not do well because they did not meet their goals or expectations. When this happens, people might want to sell their shares and not buy more. Read from source...

- The article is outdated, published in 2024, but the title has a typo, "2024" instead of the current year
- The article title is misleading, it doesn't mention that Lattice Semiconductor is one of the big losers, but instead implies that it's a general story about big losers
- The article body is poorly written, with grammatical errors, inconsistent formatting, and lack of coherence
- The article is biased, it only focuses on the negative aspects of Lattice Semiconductor, without providing any context, analysis, or counterarguments
- The article is irrelevant, it doesn't explain why Lattice Semiconductor's results are important, or how they affect the market or investors
- The article is emotional, it uses words like "crash", "tumble", "fell sharply", "mixed", "missed", "weak", "lowered", "declined", "insiders are selling", etc., to evoke negative emotions and fear in the readers
- The article is inaccurate, it uses outdated or incorrect data, such as the analyst consensus estimate of $130.172 million for Q2, which is from July 2024, not from the actual Q2 results
- The article is unoriginal, it copies and pastes parts from other sources, such as the logos, the pre-market trading session, and the Benzinga Pro data, without giving proper attribution or citation

### Final answer: The article is a poorly written, biased, and irrelevant piece of journalism that doesn't provide any value or insight for the readers. It should be rated as 1/5 stars and flagged for correction or removal.