A new cryptocurrency called Notcoin was created and given to some people who use an app called Telegram. The man who made Telegram, Pavel, really likes Notcoin and thinks it's great. But many people who got Notcoin sold it quickly for money instead of keeping it, so the price of Notcoin went down a lot in just one week. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalist, as it implies that Notcoin has failed to deliver on its promises or potential, when in fact it was never intended to be a long-term investment vehicle, but rather an incentive for developers to build on Telegram's blockchain platform.
2. The article uses the term "Telegram Crypto Hype" without defining what it means, implying that there is some sort of general public or market enthusiasm for Notcoin that is unfounded or irrational, when in fact the term could be interpreted as a reference to the broader ecosystem of applications and services built on Telegram's blockchain platform.
3. The article cites the high-profile listings on exchanges like Binance as evidence of Notcoin's popularity or demand, without acknowledging that these listings are part of a strategy to increase liquidity and awareness for the project, rather than a reflection of genuine user interest or adoption.
4. The article focuses heavily on the price action of NOT, without providing any context or analysis of the factors that may have contributed to its volatility or decline, such as market conditions, trading dynamics, or technical indicators. This creates a false impression of Notcoin's value and performance, based solely on short-term fluctuations in an unpredictable and speculative asset class.
5. The article uses emotional language and expressions to describe the reactions of investors, such as "profiteering", "tears", or "disappointment", without considering that these may be normal or expected outcomes for a crypto project that was never intended to be a long-term hold, but rather a means to an end.
6. The article fails to mention the positive aspects of Notcoin, such as its innovative design, its potential to foster creativity and collaboration among developers, or its alignment with Telegram's vision and values, which could provide a more balanced and nuanced perspective on the project.

First, we need to analyze the main drivers of Notcoin's performance and potential for growth. These include the adoption rate of the game, the demand for NOT tokens, the development of new mini-apps on Telegram, the listings on exchanges, and the overall market sentiment towards cryptocurrencies.
Second, we need to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Notcoin compared to other similar projects or competitors in the crypto space. This will help us identify any potential threats or opportunities for Notcoin in the future.