Alright, imagine you have a super important secret message that only you and your best friend can understand. But one day, someone sneaky tries to steal this secret! They want to make everyone look at a fake message instead of the real one.

This is kind of what happened with computers. There's something called "software" on them that helps us use the computer and play games. One type of software is called an "operating system," which is like the boss that tells all the other parts how to work together.

Now, a bad guy made some tricks to lie to this boss operating system and make it show fake things instead of real ones. This way, he could steal secret information or make computers do bad things without us knowing!

But don't worry, there are smart people called "hackers" who try to find these tricks and stop them before they can cause trouble. Sometimes, they even help fix the problems so that other people won't fall for the same trick anymore.

So in simple terms, hacking just means finding or making tricks on computers to either hurt them or help protect them from being hurt by other tricks! Read from source...

I've analyzed the provided text from a platform called "DAN." Here are some elements of criticism that would apply to this piece:

1. **Lack of Sourcing**: The original news source is not clearly stated or linked, which makes it difficult for readers to verify the information.

2. **Inconsistencies and Contradictions**:
- The article initially speaks about Microsoft Corp (MSFT) and its stock price but then deviates to discuss hacking, ransomware, and general tech news.
- It mentions "Microsoft Corp" at one point but uses "Microsoft" without the corporation tag elsewhere.

3. **Bias**: While not a full-blown bias, there's a subtle preference towards 'smart investing' with Benzinga, which might come off as biased to some readers ("Trade confidently...").

4. **Irrational Arguments**:
- The article uses absolutes like "all investors" and "smartest investing," but it's not supported by evidence or logic that all investors would agree.
- It also claims to simplify the market, but doesn't elaborate on how.

5. **Emotional Behavior**: While not emotionally charged itself, the article tries to evoke certain emotions, such as confidence (with phrases like "Trade confidently"), excitement ("Join Now: Free!"), and fear of missing out (FOMO) with "Already a member? Sign in").

6. **Lack of Value-added Context or Analysis**: The article is more an ad for Benzinga than actual news analysis, it lacks depth and context that would help readers understand the topics better.

7. **Clichés and Overused Phrases**:
- It uses clichéd phrases like "smart investing," "smarter investing," and "Trade confidently."
- The tagline "All Rights Reserved" is redundant as it's automatically covered by copyright laws worldwide, and doesn't add any value to communicate.

Based on the content of the article, here's a sentiment analysis:

- **Positive**: The article mentions that Microsoft (MSFT) provides market news and data through APIs.
- **Neutral**: Most of the text is factual information about the article's topic, with no evaluative language.

So, overall, the article has a **neutral** sentiment. There's nothing in it that would explicitly indicate a positive or negative feeling towards any particular subject.

Here's why:
- It doesn't praise or criticize Microsoft (MSFT).
- It simply provides information about a data breach affecting Microsoft customers and the steps taken by Microsoft to address the issue.
- The article also mentions that Microsoft is working on new features for its productivity tools.