A very smart person named Sam Altman, who is the boss of a group called OpenAI, also has a lot of shares in Reddit. Shares are like small pieces of a company that you can buy and sell. He has more shares than one of Reddit's founders, Steve Huffman. They have been friends since they were young and studied together at a special school for startups called Y Combinator. Reddit is now planning to sell parts of itself to other people who want to use its information, especially to AI companies that are also very smart. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized, implying that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has a significant stake in Reddit ahead of its IPO, when in reality he only holds more stock than the co-founder Steve Huffman, not necessarily a major shareholder. A more accurate title would be "OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Holds More Stock Than Co-Founder Steve Huffman".
2. The article relies on secondary sources from Benzinga and does not provide any original research or independent verification of the information. This undermines its credibility and usefulness for readers who want to learn more about the topic.
3. The article does not explain the nature of OpenAI's relationship with Reddit, which is relevant for understanding why Sam Altman has a stake in the company. For example, how did they collaborate on AI projects or what are their shared goals and values? This would help readers understand the context and significance of his investment.
4. The article does not mention any potential conflicts of interest between OpenAI's mission to ensure artificial general intelligence benefits humanity and Reddit's platform that hosts controversial, hateful, and harmful content. This is an important issue that should be addressed in any discussion about the role of AI leaders in social media companies.
5. The article briefly mentions Reddit's plans to expand its business through data licensing deals with AI companies, but does not provide any details or examples of how this would work or what benefits it would bring for both parties. This is a significant development that deserves more attention and explanation from the writer.

Do you want me to analyze the article and provide a summary of the main points, or do you have any specific questions about the stock or the company?