Alibaba is a big company in China that sells things online. They are trying to make their business better by improving how they move and store products, and also by buying back some of their own shares. This makes the people who own part of Alibaba happy because the company is trying to increase its value. Some experts think that Alibaba is a good investment opportunity even though it is not doing as well as before due to problems in China's economy. The price of one share of Alibaba has gone down a little bit, but some people believe it will go up again when the Chinese economy gets better. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and exaggerated, as Alibaba's strategy shift is not a "turnaround" but rather a reorganization and adjustment to the market conditions. A turnaround would imply a significant improvement in performance and profitability after a period of decline or underperformance.
2. The article praises the company's enhanced logistics, but does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim. It also fails to mention any potential challenges or risks associated with this expansion, such as increased competition, regulatory hurdles, or operational costs.
3. The analyst's confidence in Alibaba is based on a valuation of only 4x fiscal 2025 EBITDA, which is relatively low compared to other tech giants and the overall market. However, this valuation does not take into account the company's long-term growth prospects, innovation capabilities, or competitive advantages.
4. The article relies heavily on expert opinions and analyst ratings, but does not present any objective or independent analysis of Alibaba's financial performance, business model, or strategic vision. It also ignores the company's recent controversies and scandals, such as the Ant Group debacle, the IPO suspension, and the regulatory scrutiny.
5. The article ends with a promotional message for Benzinga, which is irrelevant to Alibaba's story and may be seen as an attempt to manipulate or influence the readers' perception of the company. It also raises questions about the credibility and impartiality of the author and the publication.