A man named Ted Sarandos, who works at Netflix, said that computers with artificial intelligence (AI) will not be able to make better movies or shows than humans. He thinks that people who use AI well can create better things than those who don't. Some other important people also have different opinions about AI and jobs. This is interesting because Netflix uses a lot of data to make their movies and shows more enjoyable for people like you. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that AI will not pose any threat to writers, actors, directors, while the reality is more complex and nuanced. AI may not replace human creativity or performance in the near future, but it can certainly augment, assist, or even inspire them in various ways.
- Sarandos' statement that "AI is not going to write a better screenplay than a great writer" is questionable, as AI has already demonstrated its ability to generate coherent and engaging stories based on prompts or data, such as OpenAI's GPT-3 or Netflix's own algorithms. While it may be true that current AI systems are not yet capable of creating original screenplays at the same level as human writers, there is no guarantee that future advancements will not close this gap significantly. Moreover, some critics argue that AI could potentially elevate the quality and diversity of storytelling by exploring new genres, formats, or perspectives that humans may not think of or have access to.
- Sarandos' claim that "AI is not going to replace a great performance" is also debatable, as AI can be used to generate realistic speech, facial expressions, gestures, or animations based on data or instructions, potentially enhancing the performances of human actors or creating believable digital characters. While it may be difficult for AI to replicate the emotional depth, charisma, or spontaneity of human actors in the near future, some experts suggest that AI could eventually learn from large amounts of data and feedback to improve its skills and adapt to different roles, contexts, or genres.
- Sarandos' statement that "we won't be able to tell the difference" between human and AI content is optimistic and naive, as there are already many examples of AI-generated content being indistinguishable from human-made ones in terms of quality, style, or format. For instance, some AI systems can generate realistic images, music, or videos based on textual descriptions or prompts, deceiving humans into believing they were created by a human artist. Furthermore, some AI systems can analyze and manipulate human behavior, emotions, or preferences using psychological techniques, such as deepfakes, bots, or personalization algorithms, making it harder for humans to discern the truth or intent of AI-generated content.
- Sarandos' statement that "AI is not going to take your job" is vague and unrealistic, as it depends on how one defines a job, what kind of AI system is being used, and what are the ethical, legal, or social implications of replacing human labor with machine intelligence. While