A person who works for a company that helps make airplane parts says that some planes might not be safe because they were made in a bad way. He told his bosses about it, but he lost his job and the company says everything is fine. People are worried because this same thing happened before with another plane maker called Boeing, who has had other problems too. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that there is a widespread safety issue with the 787 Dreamliner when the evidence presented in the article is limited to one whistleblower's claim.
- The article relies heavily on quotes from the whistleblower, Cuevas, without providing any independent verification or context for his allegations. This creates a one-sided and potentially unreliable narrative.
- The article mentions previous whistleblower Sam Salehpour, but does not provide any details about the nature of his concerns or how they were resolved. This suggests that the author is cherry-picking information to support a negative view of Boeing's safety practices.
- The article connects the current whistleblower allegations with other issues facing Boeing, such as the 737 Max crashes and the Starliner failure, without establishing a clear causal link between them. This is an example of guilt by association fallacy.

Negative

Analysis: This article presents a series of problems and controversies that Boeing is facing, including whistleblower allegations, safety concerns, investigations, criticism from Elon Musk, and potential criminal charges. These factors contribute to a negative sentiment around the company's reputation and performance. Additionally, the title itself uses words like "unsafe" and "whistleblower," which have negative connotations and imply wrongdoing or failure on Boeing's part.