Some people are worried that big technology companies have too much power. They make smart computers called AI that do many things for us. But a smaller company called Brand Engagement Network (BEN) is trying to compete and show they can also make good AI. BEN wants to help businesses talk better with their customers and work faster. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and clickbait, as it implies that Brand Engagement Network (BEN) is the only company standing up to Big Tech in the AI industry. This is not true, as there are other smaller companies and startups competing with or complementing the Big Tech giants in various domains of AI.
- The article body introduces BEN as a pure-play AI company that provides customer service solutions for businesses. However, it does not provide any evidence or examples of how BEN's AI systems are superior or different from those of the Big Tech competitors, such as Amazon, Google, IBM, etc.
- The article also uses vague and subjective terms, such as "heightened efficiencies" and "enhanced customer experiences", without defining or measuring them. How does BEN quantify or demonstrate these outcomes? What are the specific features or benefits of its AI solutions that make them stand out from the crowd?
- The article mentions that BEN initiated its generative AI in 2019, but it does not explain what kind of generative AI it is using, how it works, or what applications it has for customer service. Generative AI is a broad and diverse field that encompasses many techniques and methods, such as natural language processing, computer vision, deep learning, etc. The article should provide more details and examples of BEN's generative AI capabilities and achievements.
- The article ends with an incomplete sentence that implies there are some unfinished or hidden aspects of BEN's story that the author did not disclose or investigate. This creates a sense of suspicion and mistrust in the reader, as they may wonder what the author is hiding or omitting from the narrative.
- The overall tone of the article is biased and promotional, as it tries to portray BEN as a heroic and innovative company that challenges the dominance of Big Tech in AI, without acknowledging the limitations, risks, or criticisms of its approach or products. The article does not provide a balanced or objective perspective on the AI landscape, nor does it address the potential implications or consequences of BEN's actions or ambitions for the industry and society at large.