Epic Games, a company that makes video games, is suing two big companies called Google and Samsung. They say that these companies are not letting other companies make games for their devices, like phones. Epic Games is fighting for the right to make games for these devices too. They think it's not fair that only Google and Samsung can make games for their devices. They want a court to decide if this is right or wrong. Read from source...

1. The title suggests that Epic Games is starting a new battle with Google and Samsung, which implies that this is a significant and potentially impactful conflict. However, the body of the article does not support this notion. The article does not discuss any major developments or implications in the battle between Epic Games and Google and Samsung.

2. The article repeatedly uses the word "accuses" when describing Epic Games' claims against Google and Samsung. This word choice suggests that Epic Games' claims are unfounded or baseless, which is not necessarily true. It would be more accurate to use neutral language when discussing the allegations.

3. The article includes several instances of emotional language, such as "kicked off the week with a lawsuit" and "Epic insists it is fighting on behalf of all developers, not just for its personal interest." This language creates a negative impression of Epic Games and suggests that the company is being overly aggressive or combative.

4. The article quotes a spokesperson from Google, who describes the lawsuit as being "meritless." This is a clear example of bias, as the spokesperson is likely to have a vested interest in portraying the lawsuit in a negative light. It would be more accurate to provide a neutral source or multiple perspectives on the issue.

5. The article suggests that Epic Games is seeking to weaken the dominance of Google and Samsung by filing lawsuits, which is a simplistic and reductive view of the situation. It is not clear that Epic Games is motivated solely by a desire to weaken its competitors. The article should provide more context and nuance when discussing Epic Games' motivations.

6. The article includes a quote from a Samsung spokesperson, who describes Epic Games' claims as "baseless." This is another clear example of bias, as the spokesperson is likely to have a vested interest in portraying the lawsuit in a negative light. It would be more accurate to provide a neutral source or multiple perspectives on the issue.

7. The article suggests that Epic Games is "waging a battle" against Google and Samsung, which implies that the company is fighting a losing battle. This is not necessarily true, as Epic Games has already won a significant victory against Google in a previous lawsuit. The article should provide more context and nuance when discussing the status of the legal battles.

8. The article suggests that Epic Games' legal battles are causing significant disruptions to the ecosystems of Google and Samsung, which is not necessarily true. It is not clear that these lawsuits are having a major impact on the companies' operations or business models. The article should provide more context and nuance when discussing the potential implications of the lawsuits.

9. The article suggests that Epic Games'

Neutral

### Analysis:
Epic Games has started a legal battle against Google and Samsung, accusing them of conspiring to block third-party competition on Samsung devices. This marks the second lawsuit filed by Epic Games against Google, who accuses Samsung and Google of violating antitrust laws in application distribution on Samsung devices. Epic claims that Samsung's "Auto Blocker" feature, which is turned on by default and only allows apps from authorized sources such as the Samsung Galaxy Store or Google Play Store to be installed, violates the jury's verdict from December. Google has denied any collusion with Samsung on the "Auto Blocker" feature and described the lawsuit as being meritless. While Epic Games continues its legal battle with Google, it is also fighting Apple Inc in another ongoing legal battle.