Jim Cramer is a famous person who talks about stocks on TV. He thinks some companies are good to buy and others are not. He said that Recursion Pharmaceuticals and Axon Enterprise are good, but Corning and Intuitive Machines are not. Read from source...

- Cramer praises Recursion Pharmaceuticals as a "terrific spec" but does not provide any evidence or reasoning to support his claim. He simply states it without justifying it with facts or data. This is an example of an unsubstantiated opinion that lacks credibility and reliability.
- Cramer advises against buying Corning Incorporated because he has not been satisfied with its performance, but he does not explain why he thinks so. He bases his judgment on personal preferences and emotions rather than objective analysis or empirical evidence. This shows a lack of rationality and impartiality in his reasoning.
- Cramer dismisses Intuitive Machines without giving any details or reasons for his stance. He simply states that he is "not there on that" which implies that he has no knowledge or interest in the company or its prospects. This demonstrates a lack of thoroughness and professionalism in his approach to evaluating stocks.
- Cramer says he would hold off Axon Enterprise, but again does not provide any reasons for his decision. He leaves the audience wondering why he thinks so and what factors he considers when making his recommendations. This indicates a lack of clarity and transparency in his communication style.