OpenAI is a company that makes smart computer programs called ChatGPT. Some bad people found out how to use ChatGPT in a sneaky way, but OpenAI fixed the problem quickly. This shows that using AI can be risky and we need to be careful with it. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalist, as it implies that OpenAI has patched critical security holes in ChatGPT that could have led to user account hijacks, but the article does not provide any evidence or details of such incidents occurring. Moreover, the use of the term "critical" is subjective and exaggerated, as the vulnerabilities were not directly related to user accounts, but rather to the ChatGPT model itself.
2. The article contains several inaccuracies and contradictions, such as stating that exploiting the vulnerability requires a harmful file to be uploaded, then later mentioning that it can be triggered by clicking on a citation link. This inconsistency undermines the credibility of the report and raises questions about the validity and thoroughness of the research.
3. The article focuses too much on the potential security threat posed by AI tools like ChatGPT, while ignoring the positive aspects and benefits of using them for various applications, such as education, entertainment, customer service, and creativity. This biased perspective creates a negative impression of AI and its developers, without acknowledging the ongoing efforts to improve safety and ethics in the field.
4. The article relies heavily on external sources and references, such as Benzinga, Microsoft, and hackers from various countries, without providing any primary evidence or quotes from OpenAI itself. This lack of direct communication and verification weakens the authority and reliability of the report, and suggests that the author may have a hidden agenda or bias against OpenAI.
5. The article uses emotional language and hyperbole, such as "security threat", "potential user account hijacks", and "exploiting this vulnerability", which creates a sense of fear and urgency among the readers, without offering any concrete solutions or recommendations on how to mitigate the risks. This manipulative tactic is designed to attract attention and generate clicks, rather than informing and educating the audience.

Negative

Explanation: The article discusses the security vulnerabilities of ChatGPT and how they could potentially be exploited by hackers for cyberattacks. This creates a negative sentiment as it raises concerns about using AI tools in harmful ways and undermines trust in their safety and reliability.