A company called Archer-Daniels-Midland had some problems with their money counting, so they told people about it. Another company called FMC also made some changes in their leadership and a person named Joshua Spector said good things about them, so he wants to buy more of their stuff. Some people who watch the stock market think these companies will do well in the future, so they are telling others to buy their shares too. Read from source...

1. The article fails to provide a clear and concise overview of the main topic, which is CNBC's 'Final Trades'. It jumps from one company to another without explaining the significance or relevance of each one. This makes it difficult for readers to follow the flow of information and understand the key points.
2. The article uses vague terms such as "investigation" and "update regarding certain accounting practices" without providing any context or details about what these issues are or how they affect ADM's performance. This creates confusion and uncertainty among readers who may not be familiar with the company or its financial situation.
3. The article mentions UBS analyst Joshua Spector's upgrade of FMC from Neutral to Buy, but does not explain why he made this decision or what factors influenced his rating change. This leaves readers without a clear understanding of the rationale behind the upgrade and whether it is based on solid evidence or personal opinion.
4. The article lacks any critical analysis or evaluation of the information presented. It simply reports the facts without offering any insight, interpretation, or perspective on what they mean for investors or the market in general. This makes the article feel bland and uninformative.

neutral

Analysis: The article is a news report that does not express a clear opinion or bias towards any of the mentioned stocks. It provides some facts and figures about their performance and recent events, but does not indicate whether the author thinks they are good or bad investments. Therefore, the sentiment of the article is neutral.

- FMC is a good long-term buy because it has strong growth prospects in the agricultural industry, especially with the increasing demand for crop protection products due to climate change and population growth. It also has a diversified product portfolio and a solid balance sheet. The main risk is that the regulatory environment could become more stringent and affect its profitability. However, FMC has a history of innovation and adaptability, which should help it overcome any challenges.
- ADM is a good short-term buy because it has been underperforming the market due to its accounting issues and lower demand for biofuels. However, it is expected to report better earnings in the next quarter as it resolves these issues and benefits from higher commodity prices. It also has a strong presence in the global food and feed markets, which should provide stability and growth opportunities. The main risk is that the COVID-19 pandemic could continue to disrupt its operations and affect its profitability. However, ADM has been taking steps to mitigate this risk, such as enhancing its digital capabilities and supply chain resilience.