A man named Tim Sweeney is upset with Apple because he thinks they are not being fair to some people. He says that Apple has made a rule that only lets Amazon use their special system to sell things in their apps, but other people can't. This makes him and others angry because it doesn't seem fair. A famous person named Elon Musk also wants to know what is going on. This has happened before with Apple giving better deals to some companies like Amazon and not to others. People are worried that this might not be allowed by the people who make the rules for how big companies should act. Read from source...

- The author uses a sarcastic tone to mock Apple for allegedly waiving the requirement of using their in-app purchase system only for Amazon. This implies that Apple is favoring Amazon over other developers and creating an unfair advantage. However, this argument is flawed because it does not consider the possible reasons behind Apple's decision, such as legal, technical, or business factors. It also ignores the fact that Apple has made similar exceptions for other services like Netflix, Spotify, etc. Therefore, the author's accusation of bias is not well-founded and lacks evidence.
- The author mentions Elon Musk's curiosity about the situation as a way to show his support or agreement with Sweeney's criticism. However, this does not add any value to the article, nor does it provide any insight into the issue at hand. It seems like a cheap attempt to attract attention and generate engagement from Musk's fans or followers. This is a poor journalistic practice that detracts from the credibility of the piece.
- The author cites previous examples of Apple being accused of favoring Amazon over other companies, such as the reduced commission rate for Amazon Prime Video and the waiver of App Store commission for some services. While these facts may be relevant to show a pattern of behavior or a possible motive behind Apple's decision, they do not necessarily prove that Apple is acting unfairly or illegally. They also create a false impression of consensus or popularity among other players in the industry, which may not be the case. The author should have presented more nuanced and balanced perspectives from different sources and stakeholders to provide a fair and comprehensive analysis of the issue.
- The author ends with a link to Benzinga's Consumer Tech coverage, which seems like an attempt to drive traffic to their website by promoting other articles that may or may not be related to the topic at hand. This is a self-serving and manipulative tactic that does not benefit the reader or enhance the quality of journalism.

### Final answer: AI's article story critics are mostly negative, pointing out several flaws in the author's argumentation, logic, evidence, and style. AI suggests that the author should improve their research, writing, and ethical standards to produce more informative and credible journalism.