A big company called Berkshire Hathaway is facing some problems because two important people, Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger, are going to leave. These people helped the company grow a lot over time by making smart choices with the money. Some other people might want to change how the company works to make more money quickly, but that could hurt the company in the long run. The people who help run Berkshire Hathaway need to remember what Buffett and Munger taught them and focus on making good decisions for the future. Read from source...

DAN: The main problem with this article is that it assumes the reader already knows and accepts the premise that Berkshire Hathaway is a successful company built by Buffett and Munger. This is not necessarily true for everyone. Some people may have different views on what constitutes success, or how to measure it. The article also fails to acknowledge the possibility of other factors influencing the company's performance, such as market conditions, competitors, regulations, etc. It seems to imply that Berkshire Hathaway is a self-sufficient and isolated entity that can defy any external challenges or pressures. This is unrealistic and simplistic. A more nuanced and balanced perspective would be to recognize the role of luck, uncertainty, risk, and human error in the company's history, as well as the potential for change and adaptation in the future. The article also relies heavily on quotes from Davis, a board member who has a vested interest in defending the status quo and preserving the company's culture. His opinion may not reflect the views of all shareholders or stakeholders, especially those who are concerned about short-term value and accountability. The article also does not address the possible conflicts of interest or corruption within Berkshire Hathaway, such as the recent scandal involving its subsidiary Durata Therapeutics, which was accused of paying kickbacks to doctors for prescribing its products. This could tarnish the company's reputation and credibility, and expose it to legal liabilities and regulatory scrutiny. Therefore, the article is not a comprehensive or objective analysis of Berkshire Hathaway's situation, but rather a biased and selective presentation of one side of the story.