A big Chinese company called E-House wanted to make some changes to its business, but it hit a problem because of an issue with another part of the company called CRIC. They needed money to do the changes, but they couldn't get it because of this problem. Now they are trying to fix the problem and find other ways to get the money they need before time runs out. The boss of E-House said sorry for the losses and promised to make things better if given a chance. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading as it suggests that E-House rebuilding is hitting a major snag due to the stalled rights plan, while in reality, it is just one of the many factors affecting the company's restructuring process. A more accurate title would be "E-House Restructuring Faces Challenges As Rights Plan Stalls".
2. The article focuses too much on the collateral issue with CRIC and the bank, while ignoring other important aspects of the reorganization, such as the integration of online real estate marketing business into TM Home, which could potentially generate more value for shareholders.
3. The article uses vague terms like "sticking point", "impasse", and "unexpectedly changed its mind" to describe the situation between E-House, CRIC, and the bank, without providing any concrete evidence or reasoning behind their actions and decisions. A more in-depth analysis of the motives and interests of each party involved would be helpful for readers to understand the complexities of the case better.
4. The article relies heavily on speculation and conjecture, such as "there may still be hope" and "the clock continues to tick down", without offering any solid facts or data to support these claims. A more balanced and objective approach would be to present both the risks and opportunities that E-House faces in its restructuring process, rather than just emphasizing the negative outcomes.
5. The article ends with an irrelevant personal story of Zhou, the CEO of E-House, which has nothing to do with the main topic of the article or the company's performance. This seems like a desperate attempt to evoke sympathy and emotion from readers, rather than providing useful information and insights about the company and its challenges.

Negative

Key points:
- E-House is facing challenges in its restructuring plan as a bank refuses to release the collateral status of CRIC, which was used for a loan.
- The rights issue, which was part of the plan, has been stalled and E-House needs to find a solution before March 31 deadline or extend it.
- The company's founder apologized for causing losses to investors and vowed to turn a new page.

Based on the article, it seems that E-House is facing a significant challenge in its restructuring plan due to the collateral issue with a Chinese bank. This could potentially affect its ability to raise funds through a rights issue and complete the reorganization of its businesses. The company has a March 31 deadline for finalizing the plan, which may need to be extended if the situation is not resolved soon.

Investment recommendation: Sell or avoid E-House shares until further notice. The uncertainty surrounding the company's restructuring and its ability to raise funds could put pressure on its stock price and create significant risks for investors. Additionally, there may be better opportunities in other sectors or companies that offer more stable growth prospects and lower risk exposure.

Risks: Some of the key risks associated with E-House shares include the possibility of further delays or complications in its restructuring plan, a potential loss of market share or customer base as it focuses on resolving its internal issues, regulatory changes that may impact its operations or business model, and general macroeconomic factors that could affect the real estate sector or China's economy as a whole.