A man named Jack Dorsey wanted Elon Musk, who is very smart and makes cool things, to join his team at Twitter. But the people in charge of Twitter said no two times. Later, Elon Musk bought Twitter anyway. Jack Dorsey left because he didn't like how the new bosses were making decisions. Read from source...

- The article is based on an interview with Jack Dorsey, who has a clear conflict of interest and personal agenda against Elon Musk and Twitter. His credibility and objectivity are questionable at best. He may be exaggerating or misrepresenting the facts to fit his narrative.
- The article does not provide any evidence or sources to support Dorsey's claims that he tried to bring Musk on board twice, or that Musk was denied both times. It also does not explain why Twitter's board rejected Musk's membership, or what were their reasons and motivations.
- The article implies that Musk acquired Twitter after a series of controversial events in 2022, but does not specify what those events were or how they led to Musk's takeover. It also does not mention any other potential bidders or alternatives for acquiring the company.
- The article suggests that Dorsey was put off by the entry of an activist CEO, but does not define what an activist CEO is or why it would be a problem for him. It also does not acknowledge that Musk is not only an entrepreneur and innovator, but also a philanthropist and a visionary leader who has demonstrated his ability to transform industries and challenge the status quo.
- The article portrays Dorsey's exit from Twitter as a result of his disagreement with the board and Musk, but does not consider that he may have had other reasons or interests to leave the company, such as pursuing his own projects or passions, or avoiding the scrutiny and pressure of being a public figure.
- The article fails to mention any positive aspects or contributions of Dorsey's leadership or involvement with Twitter, or any potential benefits or synergies of Musk's ownership or influence on the platform. It also does not address any possible challenges or risks that Musk may face as the new owner of Twitter, such as regulatory issues, legal disputes, user backlash, or technical difficulties.
- The article is biased and sensationalized, aiming to create controversy and generate clicks, without providing a balanced or informative perspective on the topic. It relies on hearsay and speculation, rather than factual evidence or data.