A man named Gene Munster watched Apple's event where they showed a new iPad. He noticed that Apple is getting faster at making better computer parts called chips. These chips help the iPads do smart things with artificial intelligence (AI). The newest chip, M4, is really good for AI tasks and can do many calculations quickly. This makes the iPads smarter and more powerful. Read from source...

1. The author uses the word "surprise" to describe Munster's takeaway from Apple's iPad launch, implying that it was unexpected or unusual. However, this is not necessarily true, as Apple has been consistently improving and updating its silicon chips over time. This creates a false sense of novelty in the reader's mind, making them think that Munster's observation was out of the ordinary when it may not have been.
2. The author mentions that "more AI features are run on device", but does not provide any evidence or explanation for this claim. This is a sweeping statement that lacks depth and context, which makes it less credible and informative for the reader.
3. The author cites Munster's belief that Apple's focus on hardware as a competitive advantage in AI is important, but again does not provide any supporting evidence or reasoning for this assertion. This makes the argument seem weak and unconvincing, as it relies solely on one person's opinion without any backup.
4. The author states that Apple's M4 chip is expected to deliver a significant performance boost for AI tasks, but does not provide any data or benchmarks to back up this claim. This is another unsubstantiated assertion that leaves the reader wondering whether the M4 chip will actually live up to its promise of improved AI capabilities.
5. The author ends with a mention of Apple's upcoming WWDC event, where the company's AI strategy is set to be announced. This creates a sense of anticipation and excitement in the reader, but also detracts from the main topic of the article, which should be Munster's takeaway from the iPad launch. The inclusion of this detail seems unnecessary and irrelevant, as it does not add anything meaningful or insightful to the discussion.