Two famous athletes, Mike Tyson who is a boxer and Diego Maradona who played soccer, were very good friends even though they did different sports. They met each other many times and liked each other a lot, but they never smoked or drank together. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalist, as it implies that there is concrete evidence of Maradona smoking weed with Tyson, when in fact the only source for this claim is a vague statement by Tyson himself. This creates unnecessary confusion and curiosity among the readers, without delivering any substantial information or value.
2. The article starts with an irrelevant personal anecdote about Tyson receiving a signed jersey from Maradona, which does not directly relate to the main topic of the article. While this might be interesting as a side note, it does not add any value or credibility to the central claim.
3. The article then tries to establish a connection between Tyson and Maradona based on their friendship and shared passion for sports, but fails to provide any meaningful insights or analysis of how this friendship influenced their careers, personal lives, or public image. Instead, it focuses on trivial details such as the jersey controversy and the Benzinga Cannabis Capital Conference, which do not contribute to a deeper understanding of the relationship between these two icons.
4. The article ends with a vague statement by Tyson that they were "soul brothers" and loved each other from the first time they met, without providing any evidence or examples to support this claim. This creates an emotional appeal, but also leaves the reader wondering what exactly this means and how it is relevant to their lives or careers.
5. The article does not address any of the potential challenges, controversies, or criticisms that might have arisen from their friendship, such as their different backgrounds, cultures, politics, or lifestyles. This creates a superficial and idealized portrayal of their relationship, which might be misleading or inaccurate for some readers.
6. The article does not provide any sources or references for the information or quotes provided by Tyson or Maradona, which undermines its credibility and reliability. This makes it difficult for the reader to verify or corroborate the claims made by the author, or to access additional or relevant information on this topic.
7. The article does not have a clear structure, logic, or purpose, as it jumps from one detail to another without establishing a coherent narrative or argument. This makes it difficult for the reader to follow and comprehend the main point of the article, or to extract any useful or valuable information from it.
8. The article does not have a strong conclusion, as it simply restates Tyson's statement without providing any closure or resolution to the topic. This leaves the reader unsatisfied and curious about the missing details or implications of their friendship.