Comcast is a big company that provides TV, internet, and phone services to many people in the U.S. It also owns NBCUniversal, which has lots of channels and movies. Some people who have money are trying to decide what Comcast should do next. They look at how many people use their services and how much they pay for them. These people trade options, which are like bets on whether the price of Comcast's stock will go up or down. The article shows some of the biggest trades they made recently. Read from source...

- The article is titled in a misleading way, as it suggests that the author has access to the thoughts and opinions of big money investors who are trading Comcast options. In reality, the author only provides some data on the volume and open interest of these trades, which does not reveal much about what the big money is actually thinking or planning.
- The article uses vague and ambiguous terms such as "options", "trades", "volume", "open interest" without explaining their meaning or relevance for the readers who may not be familiar with these financial concepts. This creates confusion and misunderstanding among the audience, rather than informing them effectively.
- The article fails to provide any context or background information on Comcast as a company, its business model, its performance, its challenges, its opportunities, etc. This makes it difficult for the readers to evaluate the importance and relevance of the data presented in the article. For example, why is Comcast's core cable business so important? How does it compare to other competitors in the market? What are the main drivers and risks of Comcast's growth?
- The article also fails to provide any analysis or interpretation of the data on Comcast's options trades. For example, what do the volume and open interest numbers indicate about the demand and supply of Comcast's stock? How do they change over time? What are the implications for Comcast's future price movements? What are some possible scenarios or outcomes based on these data?
- The article does not include any sources or references to support its claims or assertions. This makes it difficult for the readers to verify the accuracy and credibility of the information presented in the article. For example, how did the author obtain the data on Comcast's options trades? Who are the big money investors that the author is referring to? How reliable are their trades as indicators of what they are thinking or planning?
- The article uses emotional language and tone throughout the text, such as "big money", "thinking", "bypassing", etc. This creates a sensationalist and biased impression of Comcast's options trading activity, rather than providing a objective and factual overview. For example, what does it mean to bypass something or someone in the context of options trading? How does this affect Comcast as a company or its shareholders? Why is big money relevant for the readers?