A big person who buys and sells a lot of cryptocurrency (like money on the internet) spent $24.7 million on some special kinds of cryptocurrency called altcoins after a group that makes rules said it was okay to do so. They bought these altcoins from a place called Binance, which is like a big store for different types of digital money. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that the SEC approval was the sole reason for the whale's investment when there could be other factors involved. A more accurate title would be "Whale Invests in Ethereum-Based Altcoins Amid SEC Approval".
2. The article lacks proper context and background information about the whale, such as their identity, track record, and motivations for investing in altcoins. This makes it difficult for readers to understand the significance of this investment and its potential impact on the market.
3. The use of terms like "crypto whale" and "altcoins" without defining them for the general audience is confusing and may alienate some readers who are not familiar with the crypto terminology. A brief explanation or glossary would be helpful for clarity.
4. The article focuses too much on the price movements of the altcoins and the whale's unrealized profits, which are not indicative of the actual performance or value of the investments. A more balanced approach would be to discuss the fundamental aspects of the altcoins, such as their technology, use cases, and adoption rates.
5. The article includes irrelevant details, such as another whale's purchase of WIF, which does not seem to have any connection or significance to the main topic of the story. This clutters the narrative and distracts from the key points.