The article talks about an analyst who has been right many times before. This person thinks that Amazon can grow by more than 13% and gives five other ideas for good stocks to buy. The article also says that sometimes different experts give different advice, so it can be hard for people to know what to do with their money. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized, as it implies that this analyst has a consistent 87% accuracy rate across all stock picks, which is unlikely and not supported by any evidence in the article.
2. The article does not provide any details on how the analyst's accuracy rate was calculated or what criteria were used to define success. This makes it hard for readers to evaluate the credibility of the claim.
3. The article focuses only on one stock pick (Amazon) and five other stocks that were recommended by Wall Street's most accurate analysts, without giving any context or rationale for why these stocks were chosen. This creates a selective and biased presentation of information, as it implies that these are the best or most relevant stocks to invest in, while ignoring many other factors that may influence the market dynamics.
4. The article does not mention any potential conflicts of interest or motivations behind the analyst's recommendations, which could affect their objectivity and reliability. For example, the analyst may have a financial stake in the stocks they are recommending, or may be influenced by external pressures from their employer or clients.
5. The article uses emotional language and exaggerated claims to persuade readers, such as "over 13% upside", "Wall Street's most accurate analysts", "best stock picks for last week". This appeals to the reader's emotions rather than their logic and critical thinking, which can lead to irrational decisions and overconfidence in the analyst's ability.

Neutral
Explanation: The article does not express any strong sentiment towards Amazon.com or Wall Street analysts in general. It simply reports on an analyst with a high accuracy rate and his stock picks for the week. Therefore, the overall sentiment of the article is neutral.