A famous person named Piers Morgan said that a movie called "Baby Reindeer" on Netflix might have some problems with the law. This could be bad news for Netflix and an actor named Richard Gadd, who is in the movie. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist. It suggests that there is a legal action looming over Netflix's 'Baby Reindeer', which is not the case according to the content of the article.
- The article focuses too much on Piers Morgan's opinion, who is not an expert in film or streaming platforms, and gives him more credibility than he deserves. He is known for being controversial and outspoken, but that does not make his views more valid or representative of the general audience or critics.
- The article does not provide any evidence or data to support the claim that 'Baby Reindeer' is a 'big problem' for Netflix. It only cites Piers Morgan's opinion and some quotes from Richard Gadd, who is the creator and star of the show. Neither of them are objective or unbiased sources of information, nor do they have any authority over Netflix's business decisions or performance.
- The article does not mention any other factors that could affect Netflix's success or reputation, such as the quality of its content, the competition from other streaming platforms, the customer feedback, the ratings, the reviews, etc. It only focuses on one show, which is unfair and narrow-minded.
- The article does not address any possible benefits or opportunities that Netflix could gain from producing shows like 'Baby Reindeer', such as expanding its audience, diversifying its content, testing new genres, taking risks, etc. It only presents the negative aspects and assumptions, which are not fair or balanced.
- The article does not provide any context or background information about the show, its creators, its cast, its genre, its target audience, its budget, its production process, etc. It assumes that the readers already know everything about it, which is unlikely and arrogant.
- The article uses emotional language and tone, such as 'disaster', 'flop', 'embarrassment', 'big problem', 'backlash', 'outrage', etc. to describe the show and its potential impact on Netflix. It tries to elicit strong reactions from the readers and create a sense of urgency and crisis, which is not appropriate or professional for a news article.
- The article lacks objectivity and accuracy in its reporting. It makes sweeping generalizations and exaggerations without providing any evidence or sources. It also uses selective quotation and framing to distort the meaning and intention of the people it quotes. It does not acknowledge any alternative perspectives or counterarguments, nor does it correct any errors or misinformation.