A big boss of a company called Netflix was asked why his company chose to work with WWE instead of other sports companies. He said that they liked the deal and how it made money all over the world. The deal lets Netflix have special shows from WWE like "Raw", "SmackDown" and "NXT". They also get to show some big events and documentaries about WWE. This will be true until 2025, when they can share even more things with people in different countries. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Netflix chose WWE over NBA or UFC based on some specific reasons, when in fact, it was a business decision made after evaluating various factors such as content quality, audience demand, global reach, and financial terms.
- The article uses vague and subjective language to describe the deal, such as "super happy" and "attractive". These words do not convey any concrete or objective information about the deal's value or benefits for Netflix or WWE.
- The article fails to provide any evidence or data to support its claims that WWE is more appealing than NBA or UFC to Netflix or its viewers. It does not compare the ratings, revenue, popularity, or diversity of these sports entertainment platforms, nor does it mention how they align with Netflix's overall strategy and vision.
- The article focuses too much on the short-term impact of the deal, such as the exclusivity of WWE content and the length of the agreement. It neglects to consider the long-term implications and challenges of this partnership, such as how it will affect Netflix's relationship with other sports organizations, how it will adapt to changing consumer preferences and market trends, and how it will compete with other streaming services that offer similar or alternative content.
- The article relies heavily on quotes from Netflix co-CEO Reed Hastings, who is clearly biased in favor of the deal and has a vested interest in promoting it as a success. It does not include any dissenting opinions or critical perspectives from other stakeholders, such as WWE fans, competitors, analysts, or regulators.
- The article ends with a vague and unrelated reference to Tesla, Netflix, Intel, and the S&P 500, which seems like an attempt to create a sense of urgency and importance around the deal, but does not actually add any value or relevance to the discussion.

One possible way to interpret this text is that Netflix is making a strategic move by partnering with WWE, which could potentially boost its revenue and global reach. The article also mentions that the deal has favorable economic terms for Netflix, as well as options and protections that it seeks in its general licensing deals. However, the co-CEO clarifies that this partnership does not indicate a change in Netflix's sports strategy.

Some possible risks or challenges that Netflix might face include: increased competition from other streaming platforms, changing consumer preferences and tastes, regulatory issues or changes, technical glitches or outages, content creation and distribution costs, intellectual property disputes, and so on. Additionally, the article states that the partnership with WWE is exclusive, which means that Netflix might not be able to offer other wrestling programs or events from rival organizations such as NBA or UFC.

Based on this analysis, a tentative investment recommendation for Netflix could be: buy (or hold) if you believe that the company has a strong competitive advantage and growth potential in the streaming market, especially with its original and exclusive content deals; sell (or short) if you think that the company is overvalued or faces significant challenges from rivals, regulators, or other factors. However, this recommendation should be taken as a rough guideline only and not as a definitive or professional advice, since there might be other factors or information that are relevant for making an informed decision about Netflix's stock.