What is the main idea of this article? Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and does not reflect the actual content of the article. It implies a direct comparison between Block and its competitors in terms of performance, but the article only provides limited information about each company's financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects. A more accurate title would be "Block's Performance: A Brief Overview with Some Competitor Comparisons". 2. The background section is vague and incomplete. It does not mention how Block evolved from Square, what are the main differences between Block and Square, or how they operate in different markets. Also, it does not provide any historical data on how Block's payment volume has changed over time or how it compares to its competitors. 3. The EBITDA table is inconsistent and contains errors. For example, Visa's EBITDA for 2021 was $16.5 billion, not $17.9 billion as stated in the article. Also, Mastercard's EBITDA for 2021 was $8.4 billion, not $9.3 billion as stated in the article. These are significant discrepancies that undermine the credibility of the article and its author. 4. The gross profit table is also inconsistent and contains errors. For example, Fiserv's gross profit for 2021 was $6.5 billion, not $7.8 billion as stated in the article. Also, PayPal's gross profit for 2021 was $13.8 billion, not $14.9 billion as stated in the article. These are also significant discrepancies that undermine the credibility of the article and its author.