A big company called Binance that lets people trade digital money had some problems with the U.S. government because they did not follow the rules. The person in charge, named Richard Teng, said that they have learned from their mistakes and are trying to be better now. They still face other issues, but they keep working on new things. Read from source...

- The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Binance has changed its core values or business model, which is not true according to Teng's statement. He only acknowledged past cultural issues and regulatory challenges, but did not say anything about a drastic change in the way Binance operates.
- The article uses vague terms like "regulatory maturity" and "sustainability" without explaining what they mean or how they are measured. These terms could be interpreted differently by different stakeholders, such as regulators, users, investors, etc. The article should provide more concrete examples of how Binance has improved its compliance, risk management, transparency, etc.
- The article does not mention the role of other factors that may have influenced Binance's settlement, such as political pressure, market competition, public opinion, etc. The article seems to present the settlement as a result of Binance's own actions and choices, without considering the broader context or implications.
- The article gives undue attention to Zhao's personal wealth and status, which may be irrelevant or distracting for the readers. The article should focus more on the impact of the settlement on Binance's operations, reputation, customers, partners, etc., rather than on Zhao's individual achievements or challenges.